DaleDucatte.com

"Pay attention to the world." -- Susan Sontag
 

Camellia japonica (2 of 2)

From “Fascinating Immigrants from the Far East” in Japanese Gardens by Wendy B. Murphy:

“The beauty of Japanese plants — from the satiny shimmer of a camellia to the gnarled elegance of a Japanese black pine — has fascinated Western gardeners for centuries. As early as 1694, Engelbert Kaempfer, a German doctor and naturalist with the Dutch East India Company, returned from Japan with a collection of azaleas, camellias and tree peonies that stunned botanists in Europe….

“Kaempfer gathered his plants surreptitiously and at great personal risk, for shoguns sharply watched the movements of early European traders and explorers. One plant collector was thrown out of Japan for obtaining maps of the islands. Other collectors were in mortal danger of encountering the daimio, feudal princes who believed it their patriotic duty to kill foreigners….

“Despite such obstacles, a slow but steady stream of plants trickled from Japan into Europe and eventually across the Atlantic. That trickle became a flood after Commodore Matthew Perry appeared in Tokyo Bay with American warships in 1853, forcing Japan to open trade with the West. Japanese bamboos, azaleas, hydrangeas, hostas, evergreens, lilies, peonies and flowering fruit trees all found adopted homes overseas….

“Today many Western gardeners regard these plants as native, using them liberally in landscapes without realizing their Japanese origins. The camellia, for example, has become so entwined with the folklore of the American South that its Japanese heritage (camellias first arrived in America about 1820) is all but forgotten.”

From “A Camellia Falls” by Yosa Buson in A Haiku Garden: The Four Seasons in Poems and Prints by Stephen Addiss with Fumiko and Akira Yamamoto:

          A camellia falls
spilling out
          yesterday’s rain


Hello!

This is the second of two posts with photographs of Camellia japonica, one of several Camellia species plants at Oakland Cemetery. The first post is Camellia japonica (1 of 2), where I wrote about this specimen’s especial color characteristics.

As this was the first time I’ve created a series of Camellia photographs, I had not previously learned about the plant, its botanical or cultural history, or its use in Victorian gardens like Oakland’s. I still haven’t learned enough about it, but it’s gotten my attention now and my interest in it will continue as I amble through the gardens on subsequent visits. What I find — especially what I’ll eventually discover about the two Camellia trees I mentioned in the previous post — will emerge here in the coming months. Their blooming periods — whether spring, early summer, fall, or winter — will help me identify the species, point me toward a research direction, and determine when I photograph and write about them.

The excerpt from Japanese Gardens by Wendy B. Murphy that I included at the top of this post establishes a pretty nice historical framework for Camellias to start from, taking us from the eras before Western exploration of Asia, to European exploration and imperialism beginning in the 1600s, then to the 1800s, then to the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Any of the four paragraphs could be used as a starting point for research; what direction I go will be determined by which Camellias I actually encounter and photograph — and it should be a lot of fun to uncover the ways in which Camellias “became entwined with the folklore of the American South.”

While digging into Camellia history with the Japanese Gardens excerpt in mind, I came across this…

Timeline of American Garden History

… produced by Smithsonian Gardens, a program of the Smithsonian Institution. The timeline presents the evolution of horticulture, landscaping, and national parks in the United States since the seventeenth century, something of interest to anyone learning or writing about botanical history.

If you scroll to the 1860-1890 decades, you’ll encounter the part of the timeline around which much of my photography and writing here revolves: “Victorian Gardens in the U.S.” The design of these new gardens embraced landscape and architectural themes that were heavily influenced by European Victorian culture. Scroll backward from that, and you’ll discover key historical events that led directly to the development and design of Oakland Cemetery and its continued evolution today:

  • 1820, with the establishment of a Botanic Garden in Washington, D.C.;
  • 1830, with the creation of Mount Auburn Cemetery in Massachusetts;
  • 1830-1840, which fostered the redevelopment and redesign of natural landscapes;
  • 1841, when A Treatise on the Theory and Practice of Landscape Gardening by A. J. Downing helped establish a new cultural and horticultural vocabulary for landscape design, influential on both private gardens and public spaces like Oakland;
  • 1860-1890, when Victorian gardens flourished throughout the United States, and our frequently visited Oakland expanded from its original six acres to its present size of 48 acres (in 1872).

When I photograph and write about a single plant species like Camellia japonica here, I typically start around 1860 as an anchor point, then branch out to any time or any place from there. This kind of anchoring and interpretation of geographic spaces is often referred to as genius loci, a concept that — as described in A World of Gardens by John Dixon Hunt — evolved from early Roman assessment of the spiritual significance of a place, to a more secular connotation where we consider the characteristics of a space and create meaning from connections among the elements we observe.

Within this kind of framework, we don’t just see a Camellia japonica in isolation as a lovely plant (even though it is), but instead can spin out a variety of narratives about it that may cross into disciplines like botany, architectural and landscape design, history, cultural history, or — in my work — start from examining its photographic and visual characteristics (as I did in the previous post) then bring other threads in from there. This is, of course, why I don’t post photos on Instagram (not that there’s anything wrong with that) where I can’t unroll a thousand words to go with them, but do it here where I can tell whatever story captures my fancy while I’m working on the photos and bouncing around the Internet.

The Japanese Gardens book also contains the following description of the botanical characteristics of Camellia japonica and related species:

“For centuries the Japanese have grown camellias in their gardens, admiring them for their year-round glossy dark green leaves and profusion of large waxy flowers. Sometimes Japanese gardeners use them as hedges, sometimes as ornamental trees, pruning them to accentuate their shapes. Far less delicate than generally believed, these shade-loving evergreens withstand salt air and polluted city conditions. Their 2- to 5-inch flowers come in pink, red or white, or in mixtures of these shades; the blooms may be single or multi-petaled. The thick, glossy leaves are 2 to 4 inches long.ย 

“In Japan, Korea and China, common camellia may reach a height of 45 feet or more, but in North America it usually grows 6 to 10 feet tall in 15 years and rarely exceeds 15 feet after 20 to 25 years. Some varieties, called early-blooming, flower in midfall; late-blooming types flower in midspring.
Sasanqua camellia, which may become 15 to 20 feet tall in its native Japan, becomes only 6 to 8 feet tall in most American gardens, taking 10 years to reach that size. It blooms from early to late fall.”

This description is consistent with how my photographed Camellias look — notably, the glossy leaves and large waxy flowers — but also tells me something about the yet-to-be photographed Camellia trees I mentioned earlier. From the detail in that second paragraph, I could likely estimate the trees’ minimum age; and if they’re taller than fifteen feet, they’re not only older than fifteen to twenty years, but may be capable of exceeding fifteen feet tall simply because southeastern environmental conditions could induce them to reach their native proportions. Now I just have to figure out how to stand on my own shoulders three or four times to determine their height and photograph their flowers….

Thanks for reading and taking a look!








Camellia japonica (1 of 2)

From “Camellia” in Garden Flora: The Natural and Cultural History of the Plants In Your Garden by Noel Kingsbury:

Camellia contains 125 species: about 104 in China, with more than 80% concentrated south of the Yangtze; some in Korea and Japan; and then more in Southeast Asia. The genus is thought to have originated in southern China in the Cretaceous. In the name, Linnaeus commemorates 17th-century Czech botanist Georg Kamel….

“The current range of species in cultivation encompasses three main species, each with a long history of east Asian cultivation:
Camellia japonicaย (2,000 cultivars), C. reticulataย (400 cultivars), and C. sasanquaย (300 cultivars).

“Camellias are typical evergreen understorey trees, being an important part of the forest community, usually in regions with moderate to high year-round rainfall. They are relatively slow-growing, appear late in the successional process, and can live for centuries….

“Literary and pictorial evidence suggests that camellias have been cultivated in China as ornamentals for at least 1,800 years. The Song dynasty saw a lot of creative breeding, probably mostly with
Camellia japonica, and the use of grafting to produce plants that combined multiple varieties; the Song capital of Hangzhou became a centre for growing and trading the flowers. Camellia sasanquawas also cultivated during this period. The next major stable dynasty, the Ming, saw the first books published on camellias.

“In Japan,
Camellia japonicawas taken up by the samurai in the 12th century and was much further developed in the Edo period. The Higo clan were very interested in them, and it was they who introduced C. sasanquainto cultivation in the 17th century…. “


Hello!

This is the first of two posts with photographs of a lovely small shrub that I took a few weeks ago at Oakland Cemetery. The plant is Camellia japonica, one of the many Camellia species and hybrids that are as frequently gardened in the southeast as azaleas and magnolias — especially popular since there are varieties that produce flowers from late fall through early spring when other flowering plants are dormant. In A Garden of One’s Own, Elizabeth Lawrence describes how Camellia japonica and its relative Camellia sasanqua (mentioned in the excerpt above) make excellent garden companions, as C. sasanqua blooms around Christmas in the southeast and C. japonica blooms not too long after, creating a succession of Camellia blooms across several months. Camellia japonica may flower here as early as January and as late as April, and it’s often called Japanese Camellia (though its origins are both Japanese and Chinese), or Common Camellia.

From a photographer’s perspective, though, this plant and its flowers are anything but common. The flowers in full bloom show a striking blend of magenta and red, with red increasing in intensity as you get close to the center of the flower. I was fortunate to have photographed this plant on a relatively bright but overcast day, where the gradations between magenta and red are much more evident. Bright yellow sunlight tends to “blow out” red colors and diminish the appearance of magenta (which is actually its own distinctive blend of blue and red). On a sunny day, you would likely perceive the flower as red, but in filtered light the contrast between the two colors becomes much more apparent.

If we zoom in as far as possible in Lightroom, we get a look at the individual pixels (each square in this screenshot is one colored pixel captured by the camera) from a quarter-inch section of the flower petals. This shows both the intensity of the colors and the extent to which they’re mixed together to produce the blend of red and magenta.

While they appear to be single, solid colors, these pixels are actually the camera’s interpretation of how much red, green, and blue (RGB colors and their relationships) are present in each one. Pixels toward the top of the screenshot (closer to the flower petal’s center) are shades of red, while those toward the bottom (near petal edges) are mixes of red and blue that produce magenta. How much red or how much blue is present determines how close the lower colors get to pure magenta (which contains equal amounts of red and blue). And if you imagine this image separated into horizontal thirds, the middle section contains the largest collection of mostly-red and mostly-magenta pixels adjacent to each other, which our eyes will interpret as the gradual boundary where the colors shift between magenta and red.

For complex reasons involving camera sensors, their capabilities, and their jobs as visual interpreters, the color red can be difficult to capture accurately, often rendered as oversaturated when photographed. With biological subjects like flowers — where each single pixel may represent hundreds of colored flower cells — the camera averages or balances the results within the range of colors it can reproduce. With flowers whose colors are closer to pure red, reducing saturation is often sufficient to restore their natural appearance. But with flowers whose colors are blends of red and magenta, the camera’s limits become more apparent, where red adjacent to magenta (which contains a lot of blue) produces an effect similar to chromostereopsis, the visual “vibrating” characteristic of red letters on blue backgrounds, or vice versa.

Here we see the original version of the photograph I shared above, where red is oversaturated and the boundaries between red and magenta demonstrate chromostereopsis

… while simultaneously causing a red color cast across the yellow stamens at the center of the flower. Correcting colors in a flower with these tonal combinations becomes a bit experimental in Lightroom, where it’s necessary to reduce red saturation overall but also adjust blue hues so that the smooth gradients we saw in real life are faithfully reproduced in the image. Here I’ve posted the two photos side-by-side (before then after)…

…where (I hope) it’s apparent that the adjustments reduced the excess red, restored the gradual visual transition between red and magenta colors, and clarified the yellow color and detail at the flower’s center.

This is the first time I’ve produced a series of Camellia japonica photographs from my Oakland trips, because most of them are the same red/magenta blend for which I’ve only recently developed a color correcting method I’m satisfied with. They’ll likely get additional space here in the future; but I’m intrigued about Noel Kingsbury’s statement above that Camellias grow slowly but can live for centuries. I often pass by a pair of enormous Camellia trees — one with white flowers and one with dark red/magenta flowers — that are fifteen to twenty feet tall with equivalent width. I’m wondering now, since they’re located in the cemetery’s original six acres, if they may date back to the cemetery’s 1850 founding or at least have been growing there for several decades. I’ll see what I can find out; stay tuned!

Thanks for reading and taking a look!







Hellebore Hybrids (3 of 3)

From “Breeding Hellebores” in Hellebores: A Comprehensive Guide by C. Colston Burrell and Judith Knott Tyler:

“What makes perfection? Most [hellebore] breeders select stock for vigor, color, form, and the other more obvious facets. We all want perfection: a healthy, floriferous, disease resistant plant with bright, long-lasting flower color inside and out. Interesting sepal markings, colorful nectaries, a full boss of stamens, and styles in a contrasting color are all desirable traits. Add foliage with interesting structure and presence, and you approach perfection….

“We are particularly interested in selecting for the color on the reverse of the flower. The lovely insides of hellebore flowers are the reward we get for bending over to turn them up, but the backs of the flowers are what we see most often. We find that the color of the fading blossom is almost as important as the color of the freshest flower. Many parts of North America experience warm or even hot weather during the flowering season, which fades the flowers. If a plant has a pleasing tone as it ages, the period of interest is prolonged.

“Contrast also makes flowers distinctive. Stars, rings, blotches, or other center markings are as attractive on faded flowers as on fresh ones. Dark nectaries and even dark styles stand out against pale sepals. A white-flowering plant with red nectaries and styles is beautiful when freshly opened. When the nectaries fall after pollination and the colored carpels begin to swell with seeds, the darker tones of the carpels are very appealing. Some consider foliage the most important trait when choosing hellebores, since foliage is present in the garden year-round. Foliage of the hybrids can vary greatly in size and shape, offering another path on the numerous avenues available for the hellebore breeder to explore.”


Hello!

This is the third of three posts with photos of Hellebore hybrids (Helleborus x hybridus) from Oakland Cemetery, that I took in February 2026. The first post is Hellebore Hybrids (1 of 3), and the second post is Hellebore Hybrids (2 of 3).

In our previous two episodes (haha!), we observed the differences between Hellebores with relatively simple (but still delightful) colors, tints, and patterns, to some with more distinctive color variations and stripes. The photos I saved for this last post advance from there and include the most visually distinguished Hellebores I found, where genetic enhancements have produced impressive variations in colors, patterns, and textures. Some of the differences are subtle at first glance or in isolation, but become more visible when viewed close up, by comparing the plants to each other, and when using words to describe them instead of just relying on the visuals.

Before continuing, let’s talk about one of the Hellebore’s distinctive botanical assets. It’s common to refer to the colorful parts of the plants as flowers, and their component parts as petals, since this is how we observe their similarity to other flowering plants. But Hellebore flowers (as described on Wikipedia) actually consist of “five petal-like sepals surrounding a ring of small, cup-like nectaries” — so I’m going to refer to them as sepals rather than flower petals below. That “the sepals do not fall as petals would, but remain on the plant, sometimes for many months” accounts for what appears to be an extended blooming period for Hellebores; and, as I saw at Oakland just yesterday, most of the Hellebores I photographed in February are just as vibrant now as they were six to eight weeks ago.

Here we see a partially opened flower exhibiting the Hellebore’s typical nodding — or botanically speaking, cernuous (“with a face turned toward the earth”) — habit. Purple veins are present both on the insides and outsides of each sepal, with those on the inside displaying more saturated purple veins at greater density — evident in the sepal at the far left and in the purple reflection cast by the sepal at the far right. As the sepals spread open, then, the intensely colored veins — which follow the plant’s water distribution channels, or vascular architecture — will be highly visible to pollinators and function as a visual guide or runway leading to the plant’s nectar, right near the point where the vein color is most saturated.

Here, on a plant with more elaborate sepal shapes, we see similar veining. In this case, however, the veining is accompanied by scattered spots inside the sepals, especially adjacent to or just beyond the end of the vein tributaries. As with the previous plant, the veins serve the same purpose; the spots, however, were more likely produced by breeding efforts to exhibit an additional visual characteristic for an ornamental plant like a Hellebore.

In this third image, we see veining that looks like it was deconstructed into scattered spots. While our pollinator runway analogy may fall apart at this point, notice how the distribution of spots still vaguely resembles veining, but perhaps more importantly maintains a visual relationship where the colors are most saturated close to the nectar-producing parts of the plant. Whether a pollinator sees this differently than the previous plant, we probably don’t know — but the color saturation likely entices that pollinator to get to the same point. The thin veins with adjacent spots look a bit like a purple net cast over the sepals, and the style is sometimes referred to as netted — which fits.

In this final comparison, we see most of the veining has been engineered out of the sepals. Instead, the underside of each one has produced dozens of large, highly saturated purple spots in a pattern that is most dense toward the inside edges of the sepals. If these spots look to you as if they have texture — are not flat like the spots on the previous image — it’s not your imagination. The spots do feel like bumps to the touch, a characteristic called papilla, or a “small, fleshy projection on a plant.” That their texture came through in a photograph surprised me; but if you enlarge the image and look closely, you may see why. Each spot — an accumulated column of purple-colored cells — is darker at the top and lighter at the bottom, something we visually interpret as texture or depth even with a two-dimensional representation like a photograph. Or, as I like to think of it: piles of color eventually turn into texture.

Here I’ve placed the four plants we just reviewed next to each other as snapshots to highlight their visual differences — and as a way of seeing their color, contrast, texture, and form variations in a single glance.

Thanks for reading and taking a look!