From “Water Lilies: Painter’s Obsession” in The Story of Flowers: And How They Changed the Way We Live by Noel Kingsbury:
“The endlessly popular water lily dominates planting design in open water. There is very little that can rival it for what it does. The Latin name, Nymphaea, is derived from the mythical Greek beings who were often associated with water. Water lilies are among the most primitive of all flowering plants, since fossils have been found in Jurassic rocks (201 million – 145 million years ago) and many species are thought to have changed little since….
“Water lilies in gardens are often hybrids, many bred in the nineteenth century by the Frenchman Joseph Bory Latour-Marliac. He produced about 100 varieties, initially as a hobby, but later realizing their commercial importance and subsequently naming only sterile selections, so that other growers could not obtain them from seed. He produced varieties that grew at various depths, including dwarfs. Tropical water lilies have also been extensively and gloriously hybridized.
“The flower is particularly associated with the prolific French Impressionist painter Claude Monet, who in 1883 bought a house at Giverny outside Paris and dedicated himself increasingly to gardening, including making extensive ponds in which he grew wild and hybrid water lilies. Many among his final series of paintings, which record his progressive loss of sight, feature his ponds and water lilies on vast, highly atmospheric canvases.”
From “Plant Architecture: Roots, Stems, and Leaves” in Botany, Principles and Applications by Roy H. Saigo:
“Plants adapted to life in the water are called hydrophytes (water plants). The evolution of vascular plants involved increasing adaptation to a terrestrial environment. Hydrophytic vascular plants — especially those that live submerged — therefore demonstrate specific adaptations to overcome their own terrestriality! To adapt to loss of essential radiation by the light-filtering effects of water, leaf surfaces may be large and expansive near or above the water surface, like those of the water lily (Nymphaea)….
“Because water loss is not a problem, leaf area is not limited by this factor. Similarly, a dense cuticle is not critical to survival except for the exposed surfaces of emergent or floating leaves, like those of the water lily. Large intercellular spaces in the leaves enhance gas exchange and provide buoyancy to keep leaves near surface sunlight….
“Hydrophytes obtain oxygen and carbon dioxide by direct diffusion between plant tissues and the water or through stomates on surfaces exposed to the atmosphere. In the water lily, for example, stomates are localized primarily on the upper surface of the leaf. In contrast, terrestrial plant leaves usually have a preponderance of stomates on the lower leaf surface.
“Most hydrophytes have reduced water-conducting systems, apparently as an evolutionary response to very restricted (if any) net water loss. In addition, large air channels provide internal gas exchange pathways for stem and root tissues.”
Hello!
This is the first of two posts with photographs of Water Lilies that I took on one cloudy and one sunny midsummer day at Oakland Cemetery. I had never photographed their Water Lilies before, though the fountain and pond have occasionally snuck into other photos — such as those of the Formosa Lilies that I posted a couple of weeks ago (see Discovering the Formosa Lily (3 of 3)).
Water Lilies are conveniently included on Wikipedia’s List of plants known as lily page, which, despite its title, actually lists many plants that are commonly known as lilies but aren’t — that is, they aren’t members of the Lilium genus that encompasses “true lilies.” They are, instead, members of the Nymphaea genus — a name that’s easy to remember given how the word “Nymphaea” (pronounced “nymphia”) is connected to water nymphs of Greek mythology.
Since this was the first time I had dwelt with my camera on Oakland’s Water Lilies, I didn’t know much about them, but I believe I’ve identified this collection of plants as a mix of Nymphaea candida, Nymphaea odorata, and Nymphaea mexicana. I’ve also learned that since Water Lilies are “extensively and gloriously hybridized” — as Noel Kingsbury notes above — they could be hybrids of any of those three (or others). We won’t worry about that too much; the genus identification of Nymphaea is close enough for now. With that in mind, we have quite a few interesting stories to explore here (and in the next post) about these plants, their flowers, their botanical and cultural history, the fountain and pond where they live at Oakland, and the use of Water Lilies in Victorian garden cemeteries. Let’s begin!
The fountain in these photos is called “Out in the Rain” and features a boy and girl holding an umbrella as they stand above the center of the pond. When the fountain is in operation, water sprays from the finial or ferrule (the very top of the umbrella tube), then cascades down the umbrella’s canopy to sprinkle into the pond, with soft sounds like rain tapping at a puddle. In my first photo below, you can see — at the bottom of the frame — part of the inlaid historical marker near the edge of the pond wall. Regrettably, The Photographer neglected to take a picture of the whole marker, but subsequently found it on a fascinating website called The Historical Marker Database, so you can see it here. The marker was my initial introduction to the fountain’s story — which has a variety of interconnected threads that can start us traveling through the learnings I mentioned above.
“Out in the Rain” was commissioned by the city of Atlanta from a company called J. L. Mott Iron Works, and installed at Oakland around 1913. Its cast-iron design was based on that of a fountain created by the terracotta company Galloway & Graff, who based their commercially popular design on that of a similar fountain presented by an Italian artist at Philadelphia’s Centennial Exposition in 1876. Its appearance, then, derives from several generations of artistic inspiration; and, while I’m unable to find any exposition photos of the original Italian design, I did find a photo of Galloway & Graff’s version. You can see it on an auction house website, here — where the fidelity between the terracotta version and Oakland’s iron version is very apparent.
The fountain and pond have undergone multiple restorations and renovations — though you can’t tell from its appearance now, which is quite pristine. The oval-shaped, concrete-bound pond again reflects its 1913 design, which was supplanted for a few years by being covered with bricks until 2008 when it was rebuilt to reassert its 1913 roots. I didn’t know this, having never seen the brick version; but found a photograph of it here — where, by comparison, you can see the extent to which Oakland has enhanced the grounds around the fountain with considerably more plants and the dense fern plantation behind the pond.
These iterations of the fountain — and the addition of more recent, thick plantings — demonstrate the extent to which foundational thinking about historical cemeteries has changed to re-emphasize elements of their original Victorian characteristics over the use of more modern-looking materials like rows of bricks. This approach of looking back to original designs and intentions reflects broader shifts in how Victorian cemetery landscapes like Oakland’s are being imagined anew — something I covered in a previous post, Discovering the Formosa Lily (1 of 3) — and are consistent with trends that now emphasize the cultural, botanical, and memorial elements of their historical design.




Fountains, and fountains filled with Water Lilies, are often used in public gardens like Victorian cemeteries to create transitional scenes of serenity. “Out in the Rain” was established with that in mind: it’s not placed to memorialize an individual or family, but is located at a central intersection of several Oakland walkways, walkways that lead to gardens filled with the irises, lilies, roses, and zinnias (among other flowers) that I’ve shared with you on this site.
The second excerpt I included at the top of this post from Botany, Principles and Applications provides some insight into how Water Lilies differ from their landlubber counterparts. While a bit technical, it does reveal that Water Lily leaves — which spread profusely as they expand to cover the water’s surface — gather sunlight for each plant and its flowers, overlapping enough to provide the plant with stability while ensuring that most of each leaf is exposed to the light. Each leaf contains cells that, like pillows of air, enable them to float; while their waxy coating helps them shed water so they won’t absorb it like a sponge and sink. The plants’ submerged roots and the winding stems connected to the leaves help them collect and move nutrients needed for photosynthesis and growth. The plant’s leaves and roots might be considered its most important features, botanically speaking; while, like all plants, the flowers help enable its propagation by attracting the interest of pollinators with bright, highly reflective colors.
The remaining excerpt above provides a brief introduction to the artistic significance of Water Lilies throughout history — one of the most well-known being that of Claude Monet’s approach to acquiring the plants then creating a series of 250 Water Lily paintings. While Monet’s Water Lilies may be one of the most ubiquitous cultural references connecting an artist to this plant genus, it’s by far not the only one — and that’s something we’ll explore in the next post.
Thanks for reading and taking a look!






















