"Pay attention to the world." -- Susan Sontag
 

Ambitious Spring Snowflakes (Leucojum vernum) (2 of 3)

From “Snowflakes and Snowdrops: Leucojum” in The Little Bulbs: A Tale of Two Gardens by Elizabeth Lawrence:

“Nearly everyone in the South calls a snowflake a snowdrop. No matter how often Southerners are told that Leucojum aestivum, found in every dooryard, is a snowflake, they go on calling it snowdrop…. For no good reason the snowdrops (Galanthus) are very uncommon in my part of the country — not that they will not grow, but because local gardeners think that in having leucojums they already have snowdrops….

“The generic name of the snowflake, leucojum, is from the Greek. It means white violet, and was given to the plant because of the fragrance of the flowers. I never knew that they were fragrant until I read it in a book. The perfume is so subtle that you must warm the flowers in your hand before you become aware of it….

“If you trust in names there is a snowflake for each season — winter, summer, autumn, spring — but, like so many ideas that are charming in the abstract, the naming does not work out so well. The winter snowflake,
Leucojum hyemale, blooms in spring; the summer snowflake, L. aestivum, often blooms in winter in these parts; and the autumn snowflake, L. autumnale, blooms in summer.

“The spring snowflake,
L. vernum, does bloom at that season — a month later than the Galanthus, according to the books, but at the same time according to my garden record. The tips of the buds, folded between the leaves, appear above ground early in January, but they wait until the end of February to bloom. I keep hoping that a mild season will bring them out much sooner….

“Although this species has been common in British gardens since it was brought to England from central Europe at the end of the sixteenth century, it is very rare in America. In fifteen years of ordering
L. vernumwhenever I saw the name in a catalogue, the bulbs invariably proved to be L. aestivumwhen they arrived….

From “Cultivation of Leucojum” in Snowdrops and Snowflakes: A Study of the Genera Galanthus and Leucojum by F. C. Stern:

“The species of Leucojum which are most often seen in gardens are L. vernum and L. aestivum and their varieties. They all grow easily in good garden soil and are all very attractive plants. In the garden none of them appears to have any preference for any particular soils. They grow in well-drained positions in loam with or without lime and are perfectly hardy…. L. vernum is particularly useful in the garden as it flowers in February and March. It does well planted either on the north side or in a sunny place….”


Hello!

This is the second of three posts with photographs of Spring Snowflakes, Leucojum vernum, that I took at Oakland Cemetery in the middle of February. The first post is Ambitious Spring Snowflakes (Leucojum vernum) (1 of 3).

In that previous post, I described some of the differences between the Spring Snowflake and its companion species in the Leucojum genus, the Summer Snowflake (Leucojum aestivum), as well as how often plants in the Galanthus genus — Snowdrops — were thought to be the same plant, because they (allegedly!) looked like they were. So just imagine my excitement when I found this seventeenth-century botanical drawing by Hans Simon Holtzbecker (from the sites plantillustrations.org and SMK.OPEN) that shows how different these three plants really are. By placing all three in the same illustration and rendering their botanical characteristics with precision, Holtzbecker makes it easy to distinguish among them. The top plant in the drawing is the Summer Snowflake, the bottom right plant is the Spring Snowflake now made famous by my posts, and the bottom left plant is a Snowdrop.

The Snowdrop shows the distinctive helicopter blade or propeller-shaped flower petals, as I previously described. The Spring and Summer Snowflakes have flowers of similar appearance to each other, but the Summer version tends to produce a handful of flowers on each stem, whereas the Spring Snowflake typically produces only two or three. With more flowers clustered together in staggered positions, the Summer Snowflake is more likely to display flowers whose center structures are exposed to many kinds of midyear pollinators. The Spring Snowflake, on the other hand, keeps them turned toward the ground, accessible to intrepid flying insects emerging from winter and attracted to the flower’s scents, but protected from the potentially damaging elements of very early spring severe weather.

You might think, then, that we’ve dispensed with any confusion over similar-looking plants. Yet we learn through the excerpt from The Little Bulbs: A Tale of Two Gardens above that Elizabeth Lawrence, writing in 1957, considered the possibility that there was “a snowflake for each season” — so four, not just one for spring and one for summer. In this writing, the Autumn Snowflake (Leucojum autumnale) and the Winter Snowflake (Leucojum hyemale) bloom in those two additional seasons (with some overlap) to give us year-round Snowflakes.

I’ve never seen either of those Snowflakes, but if I had, I would have subsequently learned that the two plants with those names — originally Leucojum autumnale and Leucojum hyemale — have since been determined through genetic analysis to belong to a separate plant genus entirely (Acis), and are now known as Acis autumnalis and Acis trichophylla, respectively. Click here and here if you’d like to see images of these two Acis family members, where their visual similarities to both Snowdrops and our legit-Snowflakes are apparent — that visual similarity likely accounting for how all four plants got lumped into the same genus historically. When Lawrence later published Beautiful at All Seasons: Southern Gardening and Beyond in 2007, she no longer included the Autumn and Winter Snowflakes, but still gave attention to the Spring and Summer Snowflakes — noting the remains of species confusion that continue to this day, especially since the Spring Snowflake is still the more rarely encountered garden gem.

Thanks for reading and taking a look!









Ambitious Spring Snowflakes (Leucojum vernum) (1 of 3)

From “The Mediterranean and the Near East” in The Plant Hunters by Alice M. Coats:

“Spain was always a country apart, isolated physically by the barrier of the Pyrenees and politically by the Moorish occupation, which lingered till the end of the fifteenth century. The last country in Europe to be botanically explored, it was the first to be exploited by a professional horticultural collector, at a time when gardens were still in a transitional stage, part physic-garden, part botanic-garden, and only incidentally assemblages of ornamental plants.

“The collector in question was a Dutchman, Guillaume Boel (sometimes called Dr Boel), ‘in his time a very curious and cunning searcher of simples, who worked for Coys and Clusius as well as for John Parkinson, by whom he was ‘often before and hereinafter remembred’.

“The references to Boel in Parkinson’s first book (1629) are all complimentary, but in his second (1640) there are complaints that while travelling at Parkinson’s expense Boel had sent seeds to a rival (William Coys), who had forestalled the author with descriptions of the new plants — ‘while I beate the bush, another catcheth and cateth the bird.’ Nevertheless, Parkinson received from Boel some 200 packets of seeds, besides bulbs and ‘divers other rare plants dried and laid betweer papers and the collector could hardly be blamed if they did not all succeed….’

“As this implies, many of Boel’s introductions were annuals, and not all were new; but the plants he sent to England included
Scilla peruviana, Leucojum vernum, Armeria latifolia, Convolvulus tricolor, and possibly Linaria cymbalaria and Nigella hispanica.”

From Seeing Flowers: Discover the Hidden Life of Flowers by Teri Dunn Chace:

“Aptly named spring snowflake, Leucojum vernum, serves up a generous early season helping of tiny, chubby white bells with green accents. Sometimes placed in the Amaryllis family, sometimes placed with the lilies, it is especially valued for its ability to prosper in soggy ground.”


Hello!

This is the first of three posts with photographs of a flowering plant at Oakland Cemetery that always marks the transition from winter to spring in my photography projects. Its most recognized common name — Spring Snowflake — fits that timeline perfectly. It’s also sometimes referred to as Snowbell, because of the flower color and shape; or as St. Agnes Flower, a name connecting the plant to the January 21 Feast of Saint Agnes celebrated by several religious denominations. Its scientific name is Leucojum vernum, and it’s one of only two species of plants in the Leucojum genus, the other being the nearly identical Leucojum aestivum, or Summer Snowflake.

I first photographed and wrote about these plants in 2021 when I found them intermixed with Snowdrops, a plant in the Galanthus genus (see Snowdrops and Snowflakes, Daffodils and Tulip Leaves). Galanthus has since disappeared from Oakland and was probably crowded out by the highly ambitious Snowflakes, whose ground coverage has expanded dramatically each year I’ve photographed them. That 2021 post was one of the first ones where I learned — with the help of PlantNet — to distinguish between species of plants that are frequently confused until one takes a close look at the differences in their appearance. Galanthus flowers, notably, have petals that are more separate (rather than overlapping) and both longer and thinner, described, by me back then, like this: “Snowdrop flowers have petals that look like helicopter blades with only one flower on a stem; snowflakes look like tiny bells and will often produce multiple flowers, clustered near each other, at the tip of each stem.”

Five years later, that description still holds up reasonably well; but you can look at that post if you’d like to see photos that show how different they are. And if you’re really, really interested in learning about Leucojum versus Galanthus, take a look at the 1956 book Snowdrops and Snowflakes: A Study of the Genera Galanthus and Leucojum by F. C. Stern. The author covers nearly every botanical, historical, and gardening difference between the two kinds of plants going back to the 1500s, and includes posthumously published drawings and writings by E. A. Bowles — the celebrated botanist I first wrote about after stopping to photograph a Corkscrew Hazel (Corylus avellana ‘Contorta’) in 2023 (see Winter Shapes: Corkscrew Hazel), subsequently exploring that plant’s history and learning about how Bowles accumulated unusual, often overlooked or underappreciated plants in a section of his gardens that he called his “lunatic asylum.”

According to the book The Little Bulbs: A Tale of Two Gardens by Elizabeth Lawrence, Leucojum vernum — despite being vaguely characterized as having naturalized to parts of Georgia and Florida — is actually not common in southeastern gardens, so it’s noteworthy to find them at Oakland at all. But having observed and photographed these plants for six years now, and having photographed them as early as mid-February fully in bloom, I think it’s accurate to identify them as Spring Snowflakes because their Summer Snowflake relative would be unlikely to bloom before April, especially after atypically cold winters like ours of 2026. And it’s also true that the Summer Snowflake tends to produce more flowers per stem than the Spring Snowflake, which, as is evident from my photos, rarely produces more than three flowers (with an occasional exception) on each stem, and most consistently produces just three.

Here, actually, we have one of the exceptions — a plant that has produced four flowers, one of which was upturned to reveal the flower’s inner architecture. That rarity was of course what caught my eye when I was taking the photos, as it’s the only one in this entire series to reverse the plants’ normal bell-shaped nodding structure and give us a peek inside. Over my six years of photographing these plants and accumulating about 150 Snowflake photos, I only encountered upturned flowers one other time, in 2024. Like the flowers from 2024, this one appears to have become trapped between the pedicels of the other flowers, which is probably the reason it got stuck downside up.

I took this series of photos on a very blustery day, the morning after a series of thunderstorms had passed through the area — late enough in the morning that the plants had mostly breeze-dried but their bells bounced un-photogenically in the wind. One’s patience gets tested in conditions like that (especially with such tiny subjects), but I took dozens of photos from numerous distances, focal lengths, and shutter speeds to end up with enough that were decently focused and sufficient for three blog posts.

While working on the photos in Lightroom, I couldn’t help but notice the contrasts between the plants’ dark green leaves and stems, their dark surroundings, and the white blossoms — which produced a nice glow even on that cloudy day. Unlike most white flowers I photograph, Snowflake blooms are very close to pure white, featuring a complete lack of color pigment that is often present in flowers like, for example, white irises. Having noticed that, it tickled me to read that E. A. Bowles described the plant similarly in his 1914 book My Garden in Spring, where he noted that Spring Snowflakes produced flowers that are “hard to beat for pure white” — something captured 112 years later in photographs, by me!

Thanks for reading and taking a look!








White Chrysanthemum Variations (2 of 2)

From “The Chrysanthemum” in Plant-Hunting in China by Euan Hillhouse Methven Cox:

“As the florist’s Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium)is certainly the most important plant introduced from Eastern Asia…. Like so many of the Compositae, the genus Chrysanthemum has always been a muddled group. This is proved by the Index Kewensis listing no less than thirty-six genera to which various species of Chrysanthemum have at one time or another been assigned; and no cultivated member of the group has a more obscure early history than the florist’s Chrysanthemum.

“Botanists have identified first one, then another wild-growing Chrysanthemum as the ancestor from which all the garden forms have sprung. It is now clear that these cannot be regarded as simple derivatives of one species, but must be accepted as a complex garden group apparently derived from several species with its exact origin shrouded from ken by the passing of time.

“The foundation of this group may be
C. indicum, a misnamed species, as it does not occur in India… although [George] Forrest found it in Yunnan not far from the Burmese frontier. It has small yellow flowers and is widespread in China and south Japan. But evidently other species… have contributed to its immense range of variation.

“Cultivated Chrysanthemums, probably already modified by human care, were introduced from China into Japan in the eighth century A.D., so a Japanese authority, Teizo Niwa, states, and they have ever since been the subject of breeding and selection. The varieties now available exceed 5000. Is it surprising that most of these bear so little resemblance to any one wild species and that their origin should be so uncertain?

“A curious fact about the florist’s Chrysanthemum is that it was in cultivation in Holland about 1688, not in one variety alone but in six, with reddish, white, purple, yellowish, pink and purple-red flowers of great beauty. It was then lost to European gardens for almost exactly a century….”

From “White Chrysanthemum” in Basho’s Haiku: Selected Poems by Matsuo Basho, translated by David Landis Barnhill:

white chrysanthemum:
     gazing closely,
          not a speck of dust


Hello!

This is the second of two posts with photos of the last batch of white and yellow chrysanthemums that I photoshooted (!!) toward the end of 2025 at Oakland Cemetery. The first post is White Chrysanthemum Variations (1 of 2).

As I did with the previous post, I’ve switched between the two varieties I discovered cohabitating in the same section of Oakland’s landscape in the galleries below. Once again, you should be able to readily observe the characteristics that differentiate these cultivars: the lengths of individual flower petals, and the arrangements of flower clusters at the top of their stems.

I included the quotation from Plant-Hunting in China by Scottish botanist Euan Hillhouse Methven Cox at the top of this post because it added some detail to what I described in the previous post: how the florists or garden mums that are so ever-present today can be traced through a long and complex history that includes their movement to Europe (and the United States) from Japan and China, yet they are largely derived from the same two species: Chrysanthemum morifolium and Chrysanthemum indicum.

And I especially liked the Matsuo Basho haiku. It reminded me how my “gazing closely” takes place in multiple contexts: observing the chrysanthemums from multiple perspectives while out in the wilds of Oakland; taking photographs to capture their images from multiple angles and distances; and spending time (sometimes hours) analyzing the images in Lightroom and using its distraction removal and healing tools until I get versions that contain “not a speck of dust.”

Thanks for taking a look!